What and Who is a Journalist?
Rush had a good time Tuesday with this Annenberg Survey:
About One American in Four Considers Rush Limbaugh a Journalist, Roughly the Same Share as Identify Bob Woodward That Way, According to Annenberg Public Policy Center Survey
The survey raises interesting questions — questions that Andrew Sullivan and Matt at Stones Cry Out may find interesting as well. Curiously, Andrew’s Hannity/Cheney selections are factually correct — are we to become exercised about who states facts?
Alas, the American Heritage Dictionary provides little help.
2. Material written for publication in a newspaper or magazine or for broadcast.
If folks think Bob Woodward is a journalist given his fictions, why are Rush or Hannity not journalists — because they are advocates? If the adversarial pursuit of truth works in a courtroom in matters as mundane as life and death, why does it not work for journalism? I think it does, and I think Sean Hannity’s interview of Vice President Cheney is one picture in a larger mosiac dominated by liberal artists.
I’ve long favored the open and unabashed biases of British newspapers over the feigned objectivity here in the States.
Bully for Hannity!
UPDATE:
Thanks to Matt at Stones Cry Out for the civil discussion.
Do I find Hannity’s radio riveting? No (nor the TV show). But isn’t this simply a matter of taste?
I think an honest debate over who is and is not a journalist would be discomfiting for The Left, but folks prefer to hide behind the Hannity/Cheney red herring. Again, I cannot find anything factually incorrect in the interview (call it a love fest if you like — although Mr. Vice President probably doesn’t go for that touchy feely lingo), but I do care much, much more about yahoos who purport to be journalists concealing the facts for their latest work of fiction.
Matt’s latest thoughts capture more anti-Hannity excitement.
For Andrew Sullivan’s reader to claim to be a Buckley acolyte and not know Firing Line had an audience stretches credulity a wee bit too far for me.
I too became a political conservative first through the writings of WFB, Kirk (my Mother even attended a T.S. Eliot lecture!), Kendall, et al.
I just don’t get all the anti-Hannity Hoo Ha.
June 15th, 2005 at 7:08 AM
Thanks for the link. My issue with Hannity’s interview is that it was done on the tv show. Everyone knows his radio show is biased, and that’s fine. The television show, however, is supposed to have an aire of objectivity. Or so I thought.. Woodward has been accused of fabricating. Yet his excesses are no excuse for Hannity’s. Sean is a pundit, not a journalist.